home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: acsu.buffalo.edu!rycohen
- From: rycohen@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ross Y Cohen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: New Press Release!
- Date: 22 Mar 1996 04:46:58 GMT
- Organization: UB
- Message-ID: <4itbc2$sa1@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu>
- References: <2937.6638T1404T1877@mozart.inet.co.th> <4ie6ut$56u@serpens.rhein.de> <DoKFsB.FFM@eskimo.com> <19960322.7B1E0A0.16FD@asd07-25.dial.xs4all.nl>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: orichalc.acsu.buffalo.edu
- NNTP-Posting-User: rycohen
-
- In article <19960322.7B1E0A0.16FD@asd07-25.dial.xs4all.nl>,
- Jeroen T. Vermeulen <jtv@xs4all.nl> wrote:
- >
- >In article <DoKFsB.FFM@eskimo.com> drizzit@eskimo.com (G. Baldwin) writes:
- >> Michael van Elst (mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de) wrote:
- >
- >> : The A500 did never beat the competition. But it was cheap, cheap enough
- >> : for you to afford it. Now that you can afford more you call it crap.
- >>
- >> If I remember right, back when the A500 first came out, the standard PC was
- >> perhaps a 286 or 386SX with either EGA or VGA. SVGA was just comming
- >> out, and the SoundBlaster made its first appearance. Those systems
- >> weren't exactly cheap - the A500 wasn't either, but it was a whole lot
- >> less expensive for the things you got.
- >
-
- What's really started to scare me are these people who think
- thing are essentially ok on the Amiga scene: people don't need fast
- CPU's, people don't need 24 bit color, people don't need etc..etc...
- When I bought my original Amy in '89, I did it because
- it was so amazing. I had been away from computers for a while and I
- hadn't realized that there was quite anything like it out there; I
- was _really surprised when I saw it. Of course, there was the slightly
- adolescent pride that went along with having a machine that made other
- people's platforms a subject for humor and condescending smiles.
- The fact is, and was then too, that to attract any sort of
- a real user base (and as importantly, programmers) you either have to
- be a _real competitor in the market-share game, _or have a machine
- that makes people drool with unconcealed envy and lust. People will
- go generally for compatatbilty and what is impressive, while programmers
- are looking for powerful hardware and marketshare. I _like programming
- for the Amiga, but it has been becoming increasingly difficult to justify
- putting serious time into it (and has been for the last 3 years). I
- know there's some sort of theoretical low-end market for a cheap
- machine, but relying on it is suicide. Remember, the Amiga was _not
- cheap when it came out.
- I think AT's long term prospects would be a lot better if they
- took BE's approach: ~ $2200 machine that blows all the other paltforms
- out of the water. This would entail taking the path that D. Haynie
- has outlined a number of times: dump outmoded expensive custom chips,
- port the OS to PPC, and go modular on the design. The Amiga would
- then have recaptured the 'WOW!' factor that it used to have.
- I like my Amy alot, but, ultimately my loyalty goes to the
- machine that is better _overall.
-
- Ross.
-